
Many consider Hamlet the greatest play in the English language and its complexity is a major reason for that. So, I was skeptical that the Springer would be up to the difficulties of the roles and subtleties of the language. I was pleasantly surprised.
Chris Graham, as Hamlet, turned in a studied and delightful performance with just the right touch on the famous lines-"To be or not to be", "Poor Yorick, I knew him well", etc. His transitions from brooding, to angry, to remorseful were a little too abrupt but his delivery of the language was crisp and understandable.
Being understandable is what often kills productions of Hamlet. The language in this production was quite accessible and, excepting the first two minutes of both acts where the adrenaline was too high, enunciated well.
Rebecca McGraw as Gertrude also turned in a surprising strong performance. I'd seen Ms McGraw previously but had not grasped her stage presence and emotional palette.
The other performances were adequate but when Hamlet and Gertrude were off stage the pace seemed to slow. Ron Anderson, who is a magnificent actor as a rule, as the ghost of the king actually evoked laughs at one point. There are laughs in Hamlet-Polonius, the grave digger, even Hamlet-but the Ghost's warning is not one of them. Bruce Evers as Claudius was a little stiff and unlike my image of Claudius who must have been clever and charming to have conceived of his plot and seduced his brother's wife. In particular, the final scenes when he schemes with Laertes seemed contrived.
Most of this is trivial to a well delivered presentation, but director John Ammerman's costume choices defy explanation. One would think that since Hamlet has not been seen on the Springer stage in 130 years or so, a traditional performance wouldn't have been out of line. It's perfectly reasonable to reinterpret a play that has been seen over and over again. I even once saw Chris Coleman at the Actor's Express do Hamlet in the nude. Butt naked. So there's room for costuming decisions but it was the inconsistencies in this Hamlet that baffled me.
The Ghost showed up with a 19th Century German pointed helmet and a leisure suit. Hamlet and Horatio standing together looked exactly like Sherlock Holmes and Watson. Hamlet's last scene was played in a red vest that made him look like a Biloxi black jack dealer. For the most part, it appeared that they were using Victorian clothing in some sort of update, but they also wore swords and daggers-a little unusual in the 19th Century. Horatio rattled on about the Ghost in his armor while the Ghost stood there in his safari suit. And then, just when you thought it was updated clothes on 1600 characters, Laertes whips out a pistol.
Practically no one does Hamlet in its entirety and the cuts made in this version were well done. Characters such as Fortinbras, who is minor but closes the written play to keep the Tudors happy, were cut out entirely. There being more senior citizens in the audience than Tudors, completing Hamlet by 10 pm was welcome. Unfortunately, there were seats available though and I hope that's more a reflection of the economy than Columbus taste.